|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Patent troll may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm working on this article, your help isn't very helpful. [1]
Could you be so kind to restore the page so that the work may continue.
Thanks,
84.106.11.117 ( talk) 13:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
http://www.noahsarkzoofarm.co.uk/pages/about-us/earth-history/evolution.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.199.68.228 ( talk) 19:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you said there is no reason to add the link Talking tree to Auditory hallucination. I disagree , re inserted the link and started a dialogue on the talk page of Auditory Hallucination. I forgot to leave a comment when I did the edit, describing the reversion, that is the reason I am writing you here.-- Mark v1.0 ( talk) 15:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Category:Images of comics characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fortdj33 ( talk) 14:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Dear Geoff,
Please do not delete my Optica Software article!!!! I am still working on it. I will try to improve the sources, and get some of the the users to contribute, so please give me time.
Your push to delete, has greatly distressed me.
Regards, Ann Williamson — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnWilliamson2 ( talk • contribs) 20:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello User:GDallimore! I saw that you (correctly) reverted an edit in Flowers for Algernon due to its objective lack of secondary sourcing and its subjective insignificance. I wasn't sure whether to call the new section "In popular culture" or "Derivative works", but I was planning to add other examples (this time, sourced) of works that have been inspired by the novel. Before proceeding with the expansion, and being quite new here at Wikipedia, I'm contacting you to know if there is any kind of "veto" to expand the article with derivative works, since you rejected that content two times, instead of finding a source and accepting the addition. Sorry if this question seems naive to you, but before investing time in searching for resources, I prefer to be sure that my actions will be compatible with the content guidelines that have been chosen by you for this article. Thanks in advance for your answer! ► LowLevel (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:CIVIL, please try to refrain from calling other editors "fuckwits". Thanks, Rolf H Nelson ( talk) 04:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
You were a discussant at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Cloutier which (somewhat strangely) closed as a delete with 5 delete and 4 keep responses. The article has since been recreated through the WP:AFC process and a speedy deletion was contested. Thus, I call your attention to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Cloutier (2nd nomination).-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The brothers Čapek. Since you had some involvement with the The brothers Čapek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew ( talk) 03:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The brothers capek. Since you had some involvement with the The brothers capek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew ( talk) 03:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear GDallimore,
I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:
We are hoping to include the picture of yours ( https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/Bump-map-demo-full.png/400px-Bump-map-demo-full.png) in this book (Chapter 7, Figure 7.9). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.
Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.25.191.254 ( talk) 11:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jamesjpk. I wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia, has been tagged with a semi-active tag. I am messaging you about this because you are listed under the wiki-project's list of active participants. Please contribute to the WikiProject if you want to keep it alive! I hope that it becomes active again! Jamesjpk ( talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Design rights. Since you had some involvement with the Design rights redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Challenge (literature) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This highly US-centric article is completely redundant to Book censorship in the United States, and is written as if it were an undergraduate essay.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Drmies (
talk) 00:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The Resilient Barnstar | |
Thank you for all you do! Justin J. Liu (Dylan Smithson) ( talk) 01:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC) |
Template:Nebula Award template footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Heads up: Discussion at talk:GIF about improving the section on Full Color -- some agreement that it would be easier to see the difference if your sample image were not animated, so that the 256-color version and the full color version could be placed side by side. Feel free to weigh in. -- Elphion ( talk) 20:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
I wondering if you might assist, please. I do not have a horse in the race myself, but I find it frustrating to see Langdell's name on the Trademark Troll page when he clearly shouldn't be listed there. It is open knowledge that a number of editors did hatchet job on his EDGE Games page, adding numerous false edits to make him and his company look bad. Then they added him to this page as a further attempt to defame him. The fact is a single judge speculated as to whether he might be a troll based on incomplete facts presented in what I gather was a brief 15 minute motion hearing. He does not find Langdell a troll, he speculates that he might be. Then the press grab onto that and write articles saying he is a troll. But the fact is no court or trademark tribunal anywhere worldwide has found that he has acted as a troll. Indeed, the 2008 Federal Court case I cited found he is not a troll since he genuinely owns all his marks. And recent decisions before the UKIPO (with appeal to the Appointed Person) and before the French PTO, have all ruled that Langdell's EDGE Games does genuinely own all its marks. Thus clearly Langdell is not nor has he ever been a 'troll'. Can reason prevail and Langdell be removed from this page do you think? Vertisis ( talk) 21:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Patent troll may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm working on this article, your help isn't very helpful. [1]
Could you be so kind to restore the page so that the work may continue.
Thanks,
84.106.11.117 ( talk) 13:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
http://www.noahsarkzoofarm.co.uk/pages/about-us/earth-history/evolution.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.199.68.228 ( talk) 19:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you said there is no reason to add the link Talking tree to Auditory hallucination. I disagree , re inserted the link and started a dialogue on the talk page of Auditory Hallucination. I forgot to leave a comment when I did the edit, describing the reversion, that is the reason I am writing you here.-- Mark v1.0 ( talk) 15:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Category:Images of comics characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fortdj33 ( talk) 14:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Dear Geoff,
Please do not delete my Optica Software article!!!! I am still working on it. I will try to improve the sources, and get some of the the users to contribute, so please give me time.
Your push to delete, has greatly distressed me.
Regards, Ann Williamson — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnWilliamson2 ( talk • contribs) 20:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello User:GDallimore! I saw that you (correctly) reverted an edit in Flowers for Algernon due to its objective lack of secondary sourcing and its subjective insignificance. I wasn't sure whether to call the new section "In popular culture" or "Derivative works", but I was planning to add other examples (this time, sourced) of works that have been inspired by the novel. Before proceeding with the expansion, and being quite new here at Wikipedia, I'm contacting you to know if there is any kind of "veto" to expand the article with derivative works, since you rejected that content two times, instead of finding a source and accepting the addition. Sorry if this question seems naive to you, but before investing time in searching for resources, I prefer to be sure that my actions will be compatible with the content guidelines that have been chosen by you for this article. Thanks in advance for your answer! ► LowLevel (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:CIVIL, please try to refrain from calling other editors "fuckwits". Thanks, Rolf H Nelson ( talk) 04:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
You were a discussant at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Cloutier which (somewhat strangely) closed as a delete with 5 delete and 4 keep responses. The article has since been recreated through the WP:AFC process and a speedy deletion was contested. Thus, I call your attention to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Cloutier (2nd nomination).-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The brothers Čapek. Since you had some involvement with the The brothers Čapek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew ( talk) 03:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The brothers capek. Since you had some involvement with the The brothers capek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew ( talk) 03:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear GDallimore,
I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:
We are hoping to include the picture of yours ( https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/Bump-map-demo-full.png/400px-Bump-map-demo-full.png) in this book (Chapter 7, Figure 7.9). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.
Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.25.191.254 ( talk) 11:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jamesjpk. I wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia, has been tagged with a semi-active tag. I am messaging you about this because you are listed under the wiki-project's list of active participants. Please contribute to the WikiProject if you want to keep it alive! I hope that it becomes active again! Jamesjpk ( talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Design rights. Since you had some involvement with the Design rights redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Challenge (literature) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This highly US-centric article is completely redundant to Book censorship in the United States, and is written as if it were an undergraduate essay.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Drmies (
talk) 00:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The Resilient Barnstar | |
Thank you for all you do! Justin J. Liu (Dylan Smithson) ( talk) 01:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC) |
Template:Nebula Award template footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Heads up: Discussion at talk:GIF about improving the section on Full Color -- some agreement that it would be easier to see the difference if your sample image were not animated, so that the 256-color version and the full color version could be placed side by side. Feel free to weigh in. -- Elphion ( talk) 20:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
I wondering if you might assist, please. I do not have a horse in the race myself, but I find it frustrating to see Langdell's name on the Trademark Troll page when he clearly shouldn't be listed there. It is open knowledge that a number of editors did hatchet job on his EDGE Games page, adding numerous false edits to make him and his company look bad. Then they added him to this page as a further attempt to defame him. The fact is a single judge speculated as to whether he might be a troll based on incomplete facts presented in what I gather was a brief 15 minute motion hearing. He does not find Langdell a troll, he speculates that he might be. Then the press grab onto that and write articles saying he is a troll. But the fact is no court or trademark tribunal anywhere worldwide has found that he has acted as a troll. Indeed, the 2008 Federal Court case I cited found he is not a troll since he genuinely owns all his marks. And recent decisions before the UKIPO (with appeal to the Appointed Person) and before the French PTO, have all ruled that Langdell's EDGE Games does genuinely own all its marks. Thus clearly Langdell is not nor has he ever been a 'troll'. Can reason prevail and Langdell be removed from this page do you think? Vertisis ( talk) 21:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)