- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 22:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- StarLightMedia Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article contains no sources. It is an advertisement + Original Research. CorporateM ( Talk) 14:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see how this company can be considered non-notable unless there is a factual dispute about what is stated in the article introduction. Is it not a large broadcaster in Ukraine? Candleabracadabra ( talk) 11:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - perhaps the sources and content from the more promising versions of this article on the Russian or Ukranian Wikipedias would be helpful. The article here does need a lot of work, though -- probably the first order of business would be to axe most of the unsourced content beyond the lede for now.-- Rhododendrites ( talk) 04:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, but rewrite article using information from the Russian or Ukranian Wikipedia. This article obviously needs a lot of work, but it still has notability. Novusuna talk 18:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 22:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- StarLightMedia Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article contains no sources. It is an advertisement + Original Research. CorporateM ( Talk) 14:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see how this company can be considered non-notable unless there is a factual dispute about what is stated in the article introduction. Is it not a large broadcaster in Ukraine? Candleabracadabra ( talk) 11:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - perhaps the sources and content from the more promising versions of this article on the Russian or Ukranian Wikipedias would be helpful. The article here does need a lot of work, though -- probably the first order of business would be to axe most of the unsourced content beyond the lede for now.-- Rhododendrites ( talk) 04:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, but rewrite article using information from the Russian or Ukranian Wikipedia. This article obviously needs a lot of work, but it still has notability. Novusuna talk 18:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.