The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This seems to be an entirely non-notable recording; when I came across it as a new pags reviewer I changed it to a redirect to the band. This has been undone a couple of times (and redone by another editor)... seeking a broader consensus.
TheLongTone (
talk)
14:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
You had left a
note on my talk page, suggesting to improve this article, which is exactly what I've started to do. Would you kindly explain what do you imply by "POV pushing", exactly?
СССР (
talk)
15:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
I mean the POV that this is a notable album. At the time the note was left this article was very poorly sourced, it is not just poorly sourced.
Slatersteven (
talk)
18:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: When commenting please stay on topic, cite policy and or guidelines where ;possible and be brief.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ad Orientem (
talk)
04:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect - plausible search term, and sources can confirm its existence/name at least, but there's not enough here to establish notability. Most sources added to article are obscure music blogs or already classified as unreliable. (Like
Sputnik Music user written reviews, which violate
WP:USERG, per
WP:MUSIC/SOURCES.)
Sergecross73msg me17:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This seems to be an entirely non-notable recording; when I came across it as a new pags reviewer I changed it to a redirect to the band. This has been undone a couple of times (and redone by another editor)... seeking a broader consensus.
TheLongTone (
talk)
14:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
You had left a
note on my talk page, suggesting to improve this article, which is exactly what I've started to do. Would you kindly explain what do you imply by "POV pushing", exactly?
СССР (
talk)
15:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
I mean the POV that this is a notable album. At the time the note was left this article was very poorly sourced, it is not just poorly sourced.
Slatersteven (
talk)
18:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: When commenting please stay on topic, cite policy and or guidelines where ;possible and be brief.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ad Orientem (
talk)
04:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect - plausible search term, and sources can confirm its existence/name at least, but there's not enough here to establish notability. Most sources added to article are obscure music blogs or already classified as unreliable. (Like
Sputnik Music user written reviews, which violate
WP:USERG, per
WP:MUSIC/SOURCES.)
Sergecross73msg me17:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.