The result was no consensus. The delete !votes do not take into consideration the new sources added, so the discussion cannot be closed as delete. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 07:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC) reply
refs are blogs and self. advertising. would require a complete rewrite even if it was notable. borderline csd. Dennis Brown ( talk) 15:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete appears to be a vanity page by single-article editing user.
BaSH PR0MPT (
talk) 09:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
reply
Strong Delete Bulk of the article is WP:INDISCRIMINATE posting of album tracks, and the sources are a joke. Sixteen copies of the same forum post. I'm pretty sure forums are never a reliable source. The only other source is the company's own website, something I've always considered in bad taste when citing a business, and only independent sources can be used for assessing notability anyways. Oh wait, and their website isn't even running anymore. Angrysockhop ( talk to me) 21:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. The delete !votes do not take into consideration the new sources added, so the discussion cannot be closed as delete. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 07:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC) reply
refs are blogs and self. advertising. would require a complete rewrite even if it was notable. borderline csd. Dennis Brown ( talk) 15:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete appears to be a vanity page by single-article editing user.
BaSH PR0MPT (
talk) 09:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
reply
Strong Delete Bulk of the article is WP:INDISCRIMINATE posting of album tracks, and the sources are a joke. Sixteen copies of the same forum post. I'm pretty sure forums are never a reliable source. The only other source is the company's own website, something I've always considered in bad taste when citing a business, and only independent sources can be used for assessing notability anyways. Oh wait, and their website isn't even running anymore. Angrysockhop ( talk to me) 21:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply