This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2008 December 26. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete.
MBisanz
talk 02:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
This article has gone a year without any credible sources and isn't very encyclopediac anyway. Looks like Japanese pop-culture-cruft. RobertM525 ( talk) 03:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2008 December 26. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete.
MBisanz
talk 02:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
This article has gone a year without any credible sources and isn't very encyclopediac anyway. Looks like Japanese pop-culture-cruft. RobertM525 ( talk) 03:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply