- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Songs of Experience (U2 album)
- Songs of Experience (U2 album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Album has not been released nor does it have a confirmed release date. It is in progress with very little news and is nearly a year away from released (based on the latest comments from the band and their photographer). U2 is also notorious for talking about in progress albums and not completing them on time, so this seems to be WP:CRYSTAL. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 02:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to U2#Songs_of_Innocence_.282013.E2.80.93present.29. Right now there isn't entirely enough out there to justify an album. There are announcements that it will release, but not really much else. What has been said is pretty well covered in the main article, so I think that for now this can redirect there. When more information comes out (track listings, confirmation of recording, etc) we can always restore this and flesh out the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Shoot, thought that was the same album title. Still, we could probably rationalize a very brief one sentence line in this section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The number of times that the band provided incorrect information about their previous album should be enough to dissuade any writer from publishing nonsense like this. This is not a reliable source. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:42, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Pretty clear WP:CRYSTAL case. Latest supposed release date is nearly a year away. Who knows, perhaps they will eventually release another album, and perhaps it will be under this name--anything is possible. Even assuming all that , I don't see that there is anything particularly useful about it in the U2 article that we should be sending readers to it. Yes, I know they are an established band and all that, but WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:NOTADVERTISING. -- Hobbes Goodyear ( talk) 20:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and there is no deadline to create this article. If and when the album is released, we can recreate this properly. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 06:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Songs of Experience (U2 album)
- Songs of Experience (U2 album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Album has not been released nor does it have a confirmed release date. It is in progress with very little news and is nearly a year away from released (based on the latest comments from the band and their photographer). U2 is also notorious for talking about in progress albums and not completing them on time, so this seems to be WP:CRYSTAL. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 02:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to U2#Songs_of_Innocence_.282013.E2.80.93present.29. Right now there isn't entirely enough out there to justify an album. There are announcements that it will release, but not really much else. What has been said is pretty well covered in the main article, so I think that for now this can redirect there. When more information comes out (track listings, confirmation of recording, etc) we can always restore this and flesh out the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Shoot, thought that was the same album title. Still, we could probably rationalize a very brief one sentence line in this section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The number of times that the band provided incorrect information about their previous album should be enough to dissuade any writer from publishing nonsense like this. This is not a reliable source. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:42, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Pretty clear WP:CRYSTAL case. Latest supposed release date is nearly a year away. Who knows, perhaps they will eventually release another album, and perhaps it will be under this name--anything is possible. Even assuming all that , I don't see that there is anything particularly useful about it in the U2 article that we should be sending readers to it. Yes, I know they are an established band and all that, but WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:NOTADVERTISING. -- Hobbes Goodyear ( talk) 20:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and there is no deadline to create this article. If and when the album is released, we can recreate this properly. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 06:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.