The result was delete. Thanks everyone who contributed to the discussion. If you are not happy with the decision, please bring it up here. Missvain ( talk) 14:49, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Article about a band which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, strikes a very advertorial rather than encyclopedic tone — and was written by a member of the band (compare creator's username to the name of the guitarist), which makes it a WP:COI violation. Most of the sourcing here, further, is of the bloggy variety, with the few appropriately reliable sources (New York Times, WXPN) being short blurbs that aren't substantive enough to get a band over WP:GNG. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when they accomplish something that satisfies NMUSIC, but right now it's a promotional advertisement rather than a proper encyclopedia article, and thus needs to be deleted. Bearcat ( talk) 21:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone who contributed to the discussion. If you are not happy with the decision, please bring it up here. Missvain ( talk) 14:49, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Article about a band which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, strikes a very advertorial rather than encyclopedic tone — and was written by a member of the band (compare creator's username to the name of the guitarist), which makes it a WP:COI violation. Most of the sourcing here, further, is of the bloggy variety, with the few appropriately reliable sources (New York Times, WXPN) being short blurbs that aren't substantive enough to get a band over WP:GNG. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when they accomplish something that satisfies NMUSIC, but right now it's a promotional advertisement rather than a proper encyclopedia article, and thus needs to be deleted. Bearcat ( talk) 21:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC)