- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. With WP:NPASR. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 04:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Social and economic stratification in Appalachia
- Social and economic stratification in Appalachia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is a POV fork, focusing on (only) the bad stuff in the area. The most useful article for the issues is at Appalachia#Economy. – S. Rich ( talk) 05:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep this term is widely in use, article content can be expanded to include countervailing scholarship, but topic is notable one two three four etc. Seraphim System ( talk) 06:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete; hardly encyclopaedic and written like an essay. One large opinion piece about how terrible life is for people living there. Laurdecl talk 08:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The topic is clearly notable and so our editing policy applies. The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing not deletion and AFD is not cleanup. Andrew D. ( talk) 16:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. With WP:NPASR. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 04:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Social and economic stratification in Appalachia
- Social and economic stratification in Appalachia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is a POV fork, focusing on (only) the bad stuff in the area. The most useful article for the issues is at Appalachia#Economy. – S. Rich ( talk) 05:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep this term is widely in use, article content can be expanded to include countervailing scholarship, but topic is notable one two three four etc. Seraphim System ( talk) 06:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete; hardly encyclopaedic and written like an essay. One large opinion piece about how terrible life is for people living there. Laurdecl talk 08:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The topic is clearly notable and so our editing policy applies. The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing not deletion and AFD is not cleanup. Andrew D. ( talk) 16:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.