- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cannot merge because target does not exist. Sandstein 19:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Slosh Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim made to notability, WP:CRYSTAL John from Idegon ( talk) 14:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Milwaukee Harbor District (currently a red-link; if there's interest I'll create that page). The physical space and the organization do exist, though this park is still in the planning phase. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 21:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Userfy or Delete with option to redirect Nothing in Google books, this is more of a PROMO than a record of history. I don't see any purpose to mentioning the park until it is more than a plan. On the other hand, the Milwaukee Harbor District was created in 2015 and a search shows it is not recorded in the encyclopedia...a redirect to some material added to a relevant topic would be a good idea, and I can't say that that material should or should not mention the park. Unscintillating ( talk) 22:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cannot merge because target does not exist. Sandstein 19:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Slosh Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim made to notability, WP:CRYSTAL John from Idegon ( talk) 14:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Milwaukee Harbor District (currently a red-link; if there's interest I'll create that page). The physical space and the organization do exist, though this park is still in the planning phase. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 21:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Userfy or Delete with option to redirect Nothing in Google books, this is more of a PROMO than a record of history. I don't see any purpose to mentioning the park until it is more than a plan. On the other hand, the Milwaukee Harbor District was created in 2015 and a search shows it is not recorded in the encyclopedia...a redirect to some material added to a relevant topic would be a good idea, and I can't say that that material should or should not mention the park. Unscintillating ( talk) 22:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.