The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply
previously speedily deleted, editor has a conflict of interest and lists only references authored by him/her including their book. RadioFan ( talk) 15:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Please advise as I am new to Wikipedia: how do I provide other references if someone keeps deleting them? Am happy to work on the talk page but even that has been deleted. Talk about an infinite loop! I would be grateful for any help at this stage: what seemed like adding an encyclopediac entry from material in the public domain is now being portrayed as self-promotion with someone having fun deleting what I enter to respond to queries. Mohansodhi ( talk) 18:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
See the review on the American Society for Quality website by S. Shahbazi: http://www4.asq.org/blogs/financial-services-six-sigma/2007/10/book_review_six_sigma_pricing.html Another review is by a pricing blogger, Reuben Swartz http://blog.mimiran.com/2007/10/six-sigma-pricing-improving-pricing.html Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
Am including Özalp Özer and Robert Phillips (editors),. Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management, Oxford University Press, to appear later this year. Google Scholar lists five citations, a few of them dissertations -- should I list these? I am still unclear on "promotional" or "advertising" -- this is academic material available in the public domain. What do I as an academic gain from promoting this?
The article was deleted because it was the same material as on Knoll -- so I recreated it with new material, resulting in new objections from you. Mohansodhi ( talk)@Mohansodhi
All the references that I provided have been deleted by someone -- I don't know why. The version of the entry now does look promotional with the references deleted. I genuinely hope this is not someone's idea of having fun. Mohansodhi ( talk) 18:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
I was trying to do that and then the talk page was deleted. Also, all the additions I made to respond to the questions have also been deleted, leaving only one sentence that does seem like a promotion. I am too new to understand what is going on and don't know why someone would delete material that I am trying to provide to respond to your comments. Mohansodhi ( talk) 18:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)MohanSodhi reply
I do see it on Google Scholar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohansodhi ( talk • contribs)
I tried the following link for a few references to the book http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=Handook+Pricing+Ozalp Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
Comment: How can anyone refer to the concept without referring to the book or article? If a concept is new, the author will have to cite the original source, but you are suggesting this is not valid. I am quite surprised by this. Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi There are at least five citations on Google Scholar, but are you suggesting that these would not allowed? Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply
previously speedily deleted, editor has a conflict of interest and lists only references authored by him/her including their book. RadioFan ( talk) 15:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Please advise as I am new to Wikipedia: how do I provide other references if someone keeps deleting them? Am happy to work on the talk page but even that has been deleted. Talk about an infinite loop! I would be grateful for any help at this stage: what seemed like adding an encyclopediac entry from material in the public domain is now being portrayed as self-promotion with someone having fun deleting what I enter to respond to queries. Mohansodhi ( talk) 18:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
See the review on the American Society for Quality website by S. Shahbazi: http://www4.asq.org/blogs/financial-services-six-sigma/2007/10/book_review_six_sigma_pricing.html Another review is by a pricing blogger, Reuben Swartz http://blog.mimiran.com/2007/10/six-sigma-pricing-improving-pricing.html Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
Am including Özalp Özer and Robert Phillips (editors),. Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management, Oxford University Press, to appear later this year. Google Scholar lists five citations, a few of them dissertations -- should I list these? I am still unclear on "promotional" or "advertising" -- this is academic material available in the public domain. What do I as an academic gain from promoting this?
The article was deleted because it was the same material as on Knoll -- so I recreated it with new material, resulting in new objections from you. Mohansodhi ( talk)@Mohansodhi
All the references that I provided have been deleted by someone -- I don't know why. The version of the entry now does look promotional with the references deleted. I genuinely hope this is not someone's idea of having fun. Mohansodhi ( talk) 18:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
I was trying to do that and then the talk page was deleted. Also, all the additions I made to respond to the questions have also been deleted, leaving only one sentence that does seem like a promotion. I am too new to understand what is going on and don't know why someone would delete material that I am trying to provide to respond to your comments. Mohansodhi ( talk) 18:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)MohanSodhi reply
I do see it on Google Scholar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohansodhi ( talk • contribs)
I tried the following link for a few references to the book http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=Handook+Pricing+Ozalp Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply
Comment: How can anyone refer to the concept without referring to the book or article? If a concept is new, the author will have to cite the original source, but you are suggesting this is not valid. I am quite surprised by this. Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi There are at least five citations on Google Scholar, but are you suggesting that these would not allowed? Mohansodhi ( talk) 19:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Mohansodhi reply