- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 12:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Sir Charles James Buchanan, 4th Baronet
- Sir Charles James Buchanan, 4th Baronet ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see any grounds for notability here beyond his hereditary baronetcy which in itself is not sufficient grounds for notability. A baronet is the lowest inherited titled British order, and while hereditary Barons, Viscounts, Earls, Marquesses and Dukes were entitled to sit in the House of Lords and pass judgement on British Law prior to the House of Lords Act 1999, hereditary baronets have never had the automatic right to sit in the upper House of Lords, and thus are constitutionally insignificant. Flaming Ferrari ( talk) 13:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Again, someone else who did more than inherit a title (JP, DL, and High Sheriff). Also, these older creations, before the age of the internet, are going to be harder to verify for notability. Dhtwiki ( talk) 23:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep -- I do not think JP or DL makes a man notable, but Sheriff does. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 12:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Sir Charles James Buchanan, 4th Baronet
- Sir Charles James Buchanan, 4th Baronet ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see any grounds for notability here beyond his hereditary baronetcy which in itself is not sufficient grounds for notability. A baronet is the lowest inherited titled British order, and while hereditary Barons, Viscounts, Earls, Marquesses and Dukes were entitled to sit in the House of Lords and pass judgement on British Law prior to the House of Lords Act 1999, hereditary baronets have never had the automatic right to sit in the upper House of Lords, and thus are constitutionally insignificant. Flaming Ferrari ( talk) 13:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Again, someone else who did more than inherit a title (JP, DL, and High Sheriff). Also, these older creations, before the age of the internet, are going to be harder to verify for notability. Dhtwiki ( talk) 23:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep -- I do not think JP or DL makes a man notable, but Sheriff does. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.