The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The existence of the last name can be easily confirmed, but there seem to be no sources available that discuss the name as a name, or the community that uses it. Without such sources, we cannot write an encyclopedic article on the subject. I would have suggested converting
Sinha Roy into a simple
disambiguation page, but wikipedia only has articles on persons that use a variant spelling Singha Roy, so at best
Singha Roy would be the dismbiguation page and
Sinha Roy could redirect there.
Abecedare (
talk)
13:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete A good amount of time has been given but it hasn't improved the article source-wise. Notability still hasn't been met. It's a little strange in format as it is. Some more sourcing would allow it to be a disambig page, otherwise a straight delete or redirect (depending on thoughts on Abecedare's comment above)
Nosebagbear (
talk)
13:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Ok!I agree with the community. I am moving this page to Disambib "
Singha Roy" and redirect the page to it. Its quite clear that this article doesn't meet
WP:N, however it is not delete-worthy as well. I am copying the source code to the
Draft:Sinha Roy and edit on both the pages so that it could meet notability sometime. I am still searching on the sources and ref. to it if I get one.
ARKA (
talk)
21:02, 20 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The existence of the last name can be easily confirmed, but there seem to be no sources available that discuss the name as a name, or the community that uses it. Without such sources, we cannot write an encyclopedic article on the subject. I would have suggested converting
Sinha Roy into a simple
disambiguation page, but wikipedia only has articles on persons that use a variant spelling Singha Roy, so at best
Singha Roy would be the dismbiguation page and
Sinha Roy could redirect there.
Abecedare (
talk)
13:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete A good amount of time has been given but it hasn't improved the article source-wise. Notability still hasn't been met. It's a little strange in format as it is. Some more sourcing would allow it to be a disambig page, otherwise a straight delete or redirect (depending on thoughts on Abecedare's comment above)
Nosebagbear (
talk)
13:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Ok!I agree with the community. I am moving this page to Disambib "
Singha Roy" and redirect the page to it. Its quite clear that this article doesn't meet
WP:N, however it is not delete-worthy as well. I am copying the source code to the
Draft:Sinha Roy and edit on both the pages so that it could meet notability sometime. I am still searching on the sources and ref. to it if I get one.
ARKA (
talk)
21:02, 20 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.