The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment The Fan Club League is not affiliated to the
Football Association of Singapore in any way and is not part of the national league structure.
LRD NO (
talk) 06:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment What I see is the wide coverage of
Premier League clubs, not the fan clubs/league. Besides, coverage is not the determining factor in establishing
WP:FOOTYN. The Fan Club League is akin to the Sunday league football you get in England, and is not associated with the governing football body (FAS) nor part of the football pyramid. Regarding "assumed to meet WP:FOOTYN", WP:FOOTYN clearly states assumed non-notability unless it meets broader
WP:N criteria.
LRD NO (
talk) 07:08, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete this
fan club article for failing
WP:ORG. It currently has only weak coverage in reliable sources... such as
Straits Times (reprinted in the aforementioned
Asia One). Sourced mentions might be included elsewhere, but until this Singapore club receives more coverage, it fails
WP:ORG. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable fan league. Not part of the Singaporean football pyramid in anyway, so fails
WP:FOOTYN. Commets above regarding FOOTYN pass are rroneous and based on a misunderstanding of that agreed consensus.
Fenix down (
talk) 12:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete As a Singaporean who follows local football, I have never seen this league covered in detail (that is, beyond fixtures and results) in reliable sources. --
Hildanknight (
talk) 13:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 16:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - non-notable amateur/social/kickabout competition. Strait Times link above clearly shows coverage of the Premier League itself, not this league for fans --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 11:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - It's an amateur competition that has not received enough coverage in reliable sources.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 02:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment The Fan Club League is not affiliated to the
Football Association of Singapore in any way and is not part of the national league structure.
LRD NO (
talk) 06:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment What I see is the wide coverage of
Premier League clubs, not the fan clubs/league. Besides, coverage is not the determining factor in establishing
WP:FOOTYN. The Fan Club League is akin to the Sunday league football you get in England, and is not associated with the governing football body (FAS) nor part of the football pyramid. Regarding "assumed to meet WP:FOOTYN", WP:FOOTYN clearly states assumed non-notability unless it meets broader
WP:N criteria.
LRD NO (
talk) 07:08, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete this
fan club article for failing
WP:ORG. It currently has only weak coverage in reliable sources... such as
Straits Times (reprinted in the aforementioned
Asia One). Sourced mentions might be included elsewhere, but until this Singapore club receives more coverage, it fails
WP:ORG. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable fan league. Not part of the Singaporean football pyramid in anyway, so fails
WP:FOOTYN. Commets above regarding FOOTYN pass are rroneous and based on a misunderstanding of that agreed consensus.
Fenix down (
talk) 12:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete As a Singaporean who follows local football, I have never seen this league covered in detail (that is, beyond fixtures and results) in reliable sources. --
Hildanknight (
talk) 13:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 16:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - non-notable amateur/social/kickabout competition. Strait Times link above clearly shows coverage of the Premier League itself, not this league for fans --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 11:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - It's an amateur competition that has not received enough coverage in reliable sources.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 02:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.