The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 02:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - meets
WP:GNG with signficant nedia coverage such as
[1][2]Nfitz (
talk) 18:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
League1 Ontario, likely search term but not independently notable. Of the two sources noted by Nfitz above, the first, although it has Sigma in the article title is more heavily focussed on the overall Canadian soccer scene in general, although if more similar articles could be shown then I can see that this could be a notable team through GNG. The second source though is just
routine transfer reporting, the sort of which long standing consensus exists stating that this does not count toward notability. Either way, this source is about two players who played for the club not the club itself.
Fenix down (
talk) 13:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)reply
If they are notable, they should have articles. If they're not, they shouldn't. As it stands Durham United is also being discussed for deletion while Windsor and TFC Academy have a number of news articles and so meet notability criteria.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 15:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 02:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - meets
WP:GNG with signficant nedia coverage such as
[1][2]Nfitz (
talk) 18:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
League1 Ontario, likely search term but not independently notable. Of the two sources noted by Nfitz above, the first, although it has Sigma in the article title is more heavily focussed on the overall Canadian soccer scene in general, although if more similar articles could be shown then I can see that this could be a notable team through GNG. The second source though is just
routine transfer reporting, the sort of which long standing consensus exists stating that this does not count toward notability. Either way, this source is about two players who played for the club not the club itself.
Fenix down (
talk) 13:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)reply
If they are notable, they should have articles. If they're not, they shouldn't. As it stands Durham United is also being discussed for deletion while Windsor and TFC Academy have a number of news articles and so meet notability criteria.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 15:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.