The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete not here to offend anyone, and also the creator of the article. The subject is just a student leader and as far as i can see, not an elected representative to any house of state assembly or parliament of India. So don't pass
WP:NPOL.
Admantine123 (
talk)
03:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Student activism is not a level of political activity that confers an automatic free pass over
WP:NPOL, but the referencing isn't getting him over
WP:GNG — it isn't substantive coverage or analysis about him, but just short blurbs quoting him as a provider of soundbite, which is not what we require to establish a person's notability.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment failing NPOL is no basis for deletion - NPOL is a positive test, satisfying it confers presumed notability, not satisfying only indicates an absence of presumed notability. Furthermore, being unelected per se has no bearing on notability. Regards, --
Goldsztajn (
talk)
07:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Sources to the article are regurgitated press releases or reiterations of the subject's tweets. The photos are uploaded by a user only concerned with images of the same subject. My own searches reveal no SIGCOV, independent reliable sourcing available. Fails the GNG. Willing to reconsider my !vote with alternate sourcing. Regards, --
Goldsztajn (
talk)
08:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete not here to offend anyone, and also the creator of the article. The subject is just a student leader and as far as i can see, not an elected representative to any house of state assembly or parliament of India. So don't pass
WP:NPOL.
Admantine123 (
talk)
03:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Student activism is not a level of political activity that confers an automatic free pass over
WP:NPOL, but the referencing isn't getting him over
WP:GNG — it isn't substantive coverage or analysis about him, but just short blurbs quoting him as a provider of soundbite, which is not what we require to establish a person's notability.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment failing NPOL is no basis for deletion - NPOL is a positive test, satisfying it confers presumed notability, not satisfying only indicates an absence of presumed notability. Furthermore, being unelected per se has no bearing on notability. Regards, --
Goldsztajn (
talk)
07:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Sources to the article are regurgitated press releases or reiterations of the subject's tweets. The photos are uploaded by a user only concerned with images of the same subject. My own searches reveal no SIGCOV, independent reliable sourcing available. Fails the GNG. Willing to reconsider my !vote with alternate sourcing. Regards, --
Goldsztajn (
talk)
08:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.