The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 12:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Don't believe she meets WP:NACTOR. According to IMDB (Yes, not a reliable source) all the films she has been in have been short films
Gbawden (
talk) 08:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Don't understand what's her achievement to have an article in Wikipedia. Now its a trend among celebrities to get a Wikipedia article on their name which is very bad for Wikipedia's quality and standards. Fails
WP:NMODEL/
WP:NACTOR.
Athachil (
talk) 06:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete and comment - While I concur, after having done searches, that this person is not notable and pretty much looks to fail notability criteria, it is possibly just a bit off to compare her to a topless model (ie a Page 3 person) as I'm not seeing she's done this kind of softcore porn modelling. (Of course, the term may mean something different to its British meaning.)
Mabalu (
talk) 22:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually I used term "page 3" to refer the metropolitan celebrities. In India the meaning of "Page 3 is" different
Page 3 culture. I have updated my comment accordingly.
Athachil (
talk) 06:16, 28 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Many apologies for the misunderstanding,
User:Athachil! Language barrier strikes!
Mabalu (
talk) 18:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 12:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Don't believe she meets WP:NACTOR. According to IMDB (Yes, not a reliable source) all the films she has been in have been short films
Gbawden (
talk) 08:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Don't understand what's her achievement to have an article in Wikipedia. Now its a trend among celebrities to get a Wikipedia article on their name which is very bad for Wikipedia's quality and standards. Fails
WP:NMODEL/
WP:NACTOR.
Athachil (
talk) 06:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete and comment - While I concur, after having done searches, that this person is not notable and pretty much looks to fail notability criteria, it is possibly just a bit off to compare her to a topless model (ie a Page 3 person) as I'm not seeing she's done this kind of softcore porn modelling. (Of course, the term may mean something different to its British meaning.)
Mabalu (
talk) 22:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually I used term "page 3" to refer the metropolitan celebrities. In India the meaning of "Page 3 is" different
Page 3 culture. I have updated my comment accordingly.
Athachil (
talk) 06:16, 28 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Many apologies for the misunderstanding,
User:Athachil! Language barrier strikes!
Mabalu (
talk) 18:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.