- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Shankkar Aiyar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shankkar Aiyar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Lack of credible academic citations. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep. Complete absence of reasoned analysis. No assessment of the subject's extensive body of work. The nom argues that since the subject, a journalist and author who has never been employed as an academic, fails WP:PROF, they cannot be notable. Well, he fails NFOOTY, too, an argument no more intellectually vacant. Let's not waste editors' time any furthher and just speedy close this foolishness. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! ( talk) 15:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep. Agree with feedback above. The subject is not an academic and should not be subject to WP:NPROF. Ktin ( talk) 22:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep. While I don't think we should start writing articles on everyone that fails NPROF, his books appear to have gotten some attention in the Indian press, and I think it's enough for WP:NAUTHOR. Reviews include [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 09:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:AUTHOR and the mainstream-media book reviews found by Russ Woodroofe. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Shankkar Aiyar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shankkar Aiyar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Lack of credible academic citations. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 10:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep. Complete absence of reasoned analysis. No assessment of the subject's extensive body of work. The nom argues that since the subject, a journalist and author who has never been employed as an academic, fails WP:PROF, they cannot be notable. Well, he fails NFOOTY, too, an argument no more intellectually vacant. Let's not waste editors' time any furthher and just speedy close this foolishness. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! ( talk) 15:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep. Agree with feedback above. The subject is not an academic and should not be subject to WP:NPROF. Ktin ( talk) 22:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep. While I don't think we should start writing articles on everyone that fails NPROF, his books appear to have gotten some attention in the Indian press, and I think it's enough for WP:NAUTHOR. Reviews include [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 09:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:AUTHOR and the mainstream-media book reviews found by Russ Woodroofe. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.