- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shakinouts ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The band fails all the specific guidelines of WP:BAND as well as WP:GNG Less Unless ( talk) 11:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Less Unless ( talk) 11:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing stated here passes WP:NMUSIC, and the article is not referenced well enough to get them over WP:GNG in lieu — literally the only footnotes present here at all are two record charts, being cited to support that the album didn't chart on either of them. There are also two media hits being contextlessly listed as external links instead of being used as footnotes, but they both represent purely local coverage in purely local-interest contexts, and fail to say anything about the band that would strengthen their notability claim at all — and one of them is a dead link, to boot. As always, the existence of one or two pieces in a band's own hometown local media is not in and of itself a GNG-based exemption from having to pass any of NMUSIC's achievement-based criteria: GNG is not just "count the media hits and keep anything that gets to two", but also takes into account factors like the depth of the sources, the geographic range of the sources and the context of what they're getting coverage for. Bearcat ( talk) 16:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shakinouts ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The band fails all the specific guidelines of WP:BAND as well as WP:GNG Less Unless ( talk) 11:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Less Unless ( talk) 11:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing stated here passes WP:NMUSIC, and the article is not referenced well enough to get them over WP:GNG in lieu — literally the only footnotes present here at all are two record charts, being cited to support that the album didn't chart on either of them. There are also two media hits being contextlessly listed as external links instead of being used as footnotes, but they both represent purely local coverage in purely local-interest contexts, and fail to say anything about the band that would strengthen their notability claim at all — and one of them is a dead link, to boot. As always, the existence of one or two pieces in a band's own hometown local media is not in and of itself a GNG-based exemption from having to pass any of NMUSIC's achievement-based criteria: GNG is not just "count the media hits and keep anything that gets to two", but also takes into account factors like the depth of the sources, the geographic range of the sources and the context of what they're getting coverage for. Bearcat ( talk) 16:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.