- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Passes WP:GNG after improvements made by contributors during the discussion. (non-admin closure) — Amkgp 💬 17:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shades of Death Road ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. Sourced almost entirely to the tabloid-like publication "Weird NJ", Shades of Death Road has received very little coverage in high-quality reliable sources. There is no indication that this legend carries any history or significance beyond its promotion by Weird NJ. – dlthewave ☎ 06:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I have added additional sources that weren't available years ago when I first created the article: a book, a newspaper article, and an episode of a nationally telecast TV series. That disproves your claim in the nomination. Daniel Case ( talk) 07:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has WP:SIGCOV as per Daniel. Jumpytoo Talk 01:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - The scope and breadth of reliable and verifiable sources, particularly as added, meets the notability standard. Alansohn ( talk) 03:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets WP:GNG thanks to the improvements by Daniel Case. Netherzone ( talk) 22:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Passes WP:GNG after improvements made by contributors during the discussion. (non-admin closure) — Amkgp 💬 17:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shades of Death Road ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. Sourced almost entirely to the tabloid-like publication "Weird NJ", Shades of Death Road has received very little coverage in high-quality reliable sources. There is no indication that this legend carries any history or significance beyond its promotion by Weird NJ. – dlthewave ☎ 06:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I have added additional sources that weren't available years ago when I first created the article: a book, a newspaper article, and an episode of a nationally telecast TV series. That disproves your claim in the nomination. Daniel Case ( talk) 07:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has WP:SIGCOV as per Daniel. Jumpytoo Talk 01:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - The scope and breadth of reliable and verifiable sources, particularly as added, meets the notability standard. Alansohn ( talk) 03:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets WP:GNG thanks to the improvements by Daniel Case. Netherzone ( talk) 22:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.