The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This seems to be the same thing as
Sabbath mode. Page has also been tagged as a
WP:NEO since December 2011. I don't think a merge is necessary since everything is already covered on Sabbath mode page.
mikeman67 (
talk) 19:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect The above analysis seems to be correct. I suggest somebody go over the text of both articles to make sure nothing needs to be merged, and then we can redirect this to Shabbat mode.
Debresser (
talk) 20:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect: as per above users.
The New York Times source given in this article does not even have word "module", but it does have "mode". --
Human3015TALK 21:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge / Redirect to
Sabbath mode I don't see any meaningful difference between the two concepts or their articles. In looking at the various combinations of Shabbat vs. Sabbath and Mode vs. Module via Google search I find "sabbath mode" - 370,000; "shabbat mode" - 3,680; "shabbat module" - 1,040; and "sabbath module" - 419. I think that the results show which term is primary.
Alansohn (
talk) 22:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge / Redirect as per above - seems pretty obvious.
UltraExactZZSaid~
Did 16:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This seems to be the same thing as
Sabbath mode. Page has also been tagged as a
WP:NEO since December 2011. I don't think a merge is necessary since everything is already covered on Sabbath mode page.
mikeman67 (
talk) 19:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect The above analysis seems to be correct. I suggest somebody go over the text of both articles to make sure nothing needs to be merged, and then we can redirect this to Shabbat mode.
Debresser (
talk) 20:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect: as per above users.
The New York Times source given in this article does not even have word "module", but it does have "mode". --
Human3015TALK 21:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge / Redirect to
Sabbath mode I don't see any meaningful difference between the two concepts or their articles. In looking at the various combinations of Shabbat vs. Sabbath and Mode vs. Module via Google search I find "sabbath mode" - 370,000; "shabbat mode" - 3,680; "shabbat module" - 1,040; and "sabbath module" - 419. I think that the results show which term is primary.
Alansohn (
talk) 22:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge / Redirect as per above - seems pretty obvious.
UltraExactZZSaid~
Did 16:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.