The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 02:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Non-notable entrepreneur; article by
single-issue user. Sources given are not about this person, but about the company he founded. I have been unable to find any significant coverage of this person.
Haakon (
talk) 11:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JForget 00:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, and merge these few sentences into
TokBox. His company/product is notable; he is not. --
MelanieN (
talk) 01:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 02:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Non-notable entrepreneur; article by
single-issue user. Sources given are not about this person, but about the company he founded. I have been unable to find any significant coverage of this person.
Haakon (
talk) 11:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JForget 00:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, and merge these few sentences into
TokBox. His company/product is notable; he is not. --
MelanieN (
talk) 01:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.