The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep. It produces notable films and publishes notable book. The only question to decide is whether to keep an independent article or merge into its principal owner, the very notable
Clive Barker. There are good arguments on both sides of that question, but none for outright deletion. It's not a Lucasfilm-scale business, but, like Peter Jackson's
Wingnut Films, it's more consequential than most of the members of
Category:Film production companies of the United States. Given the nom's failure to provide anything more than an unsupported just-not-notable rationale, there's no reason not to extend this discussion.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (
talk) 01:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Question - Where is the significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic?
JMHamo (
talk) 08:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Clive Barker as my searches found nothing convincingly better and this is questionable for solid independent notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 00:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep. It produces notable films and publishes notable book. The only question to decide is whether to keep an independent article or merge into its principal owner, the very notable
Clive Barker. There are good arguments on both sides of that question, but none for outright deletion. It's not a Lucasfilm-scale business, but, like Peter Jackson's
Wingnut Films, it's more consequential than most of the members of
Category:Film production companies of the United States. Given the nom's failure to provide anything more than an unsupported just-not-notable rationale, there's no reason not to extend this discussion.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (
talk) 01:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Question - Where is the significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic?
JMHamo (
talk) 08:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Clive Barker as my searches found nothing convincingly better and this is questionable for solid independent notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 00:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.