- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Sean Hoy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sean Hoy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia:Notability (politics) proposes that diplomatic notability should be a person who has "received significant coverage in crafting an international agreement or related to a notable diplomatic event." I am not convinced that there is anything particularly noteworthy about the subject's diplomatic career in this instance, to necessitate its own article. Uhooep ( talk) 08:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Of the sources in the article, one is a press release from his alma mata and another is a local news story reporting that someone local has become an ambassador - neither of these satisfy GNG. I can't find much more online - a few passing mentions as you'd expect for an ambassador (short quotations, passing mentions, and a couple of speeches he's given), all quite routine. WJ94 ( talk) 10:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and Ireland. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (politics) and WP:NBASIC. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 02:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There is no evidence of notability Almeida Fernando ( talk) 09:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Evidence is effectively absent. The few sources fail. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Sean Hoy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sean Hoy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia:Notability (politics) proposes that diplomatic notability should be a person who has "received significant coverage in crafting an international agreement or related to a notable diplomatic event." I am not convinced that there is anything particularly noteworthy about the subject's diplomatic career in this instance, to necessitate its own article. Uhooep ( talk) 08:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Of the sources in the article, one is a press release from his alma mata and another is a local news story reporting that someone local has become an ambassador - neither of these satisfy GNG. I can't find much more online - a few passing mentions as you'd expect for an ambassador (short quotations, passing mentions, and a couple of speeches he's given), all quite routine. WJ94 ( talk) 10:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and Ireland. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (politics) and WP:NBASIC. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 02:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There is no evidence of notability Almeida Fernando ( talk) 09:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Evidence is effectively absent. The few sources fail. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.