- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Scratch21
- Scratch21 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Scratch21 (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Generations (Scratch21 album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Poorly sourced (the only footnoted "reference" here is a Facebook post, and none of the external links constitute reliable source coverage in media either) article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, along with a completely unreferenced article about their debut EP and a social media-sourced article about their forthcoming full-length album. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which every band gets to have an article just because they exist -- real, reliable source coverage in real (not social) media, supporting a claim of notability that passes NMUSIC, must be present for the band to earn a Wikipedia article. Delete, without prejudice against future recreation if their notability and sourceability improve. Bearcat ( talk) 23:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet WP:MUSIC which requires substantial, notable sources and/or recording on a major label and/or charting. This band may have that in its future, but not yet. LaMona ( talk) 02:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as not yet acceptable, nothing at least for minimal notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Scratch21
- Scratch21 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Scratch21 (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Generations (Scratch21 album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Poorly sourced (the only footnoted "reference" here is a Facebook post, and none of the external links constitute reliable source coverage in media either) article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, along with a completely unreferenced article about their debut EP and a social media-sourced article about their forthcoming full-length album. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which every band gets to have an article just because they exist -- real, reliable source coverage in real (not social) media, supporting a claim of notability that passes NMUSIC, must be present for the band to earn a Wikipedia article. Delete, without prejudice against future recreation if their notability and sourceability improve. Bearcat ( talk) 23:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet WP:MUSIC which requires substantial, notable sources and/or recording on a major label and/or charting. This band may have that in its future, but not yet. LaMona ( talk) 02:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as not yet acceptable, nothing at least for minimal notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.