- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Scott Mitic
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Scott Mitic ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. The sources that mention the subject are actually about other subjects, not the subject of this article directly. I see issues here with puffery via REFBOMB. The author also wrote an article about a company founded by this person and I have COI concerns around that. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 15:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.
Shellwood (
talk) 16:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete "a professional in the field" simply means he works, I don't find reviews for the one book he wrote and the rest doesn't seem much beyond routine coverage. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There doesn't seem to be much significant coverage on the subject, probably fails WP:BIO. All the given references mention him only in passing and his book is not particularly well-known. It seems that his most noteworthy accomplishment is founding the company TrustedID, later acquired by Equifax. Possibly merge into Equifax. GoldMiner24 Talk 17:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete only passing references fails WP:GNG. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 04:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Scott Mitic
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Scott Mitic ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. The sources that mention the subject are actually about other subjects, not the subject of this article directly. I see issues here with puffery via REFBOMB. The author also wrote an article about a company founded by this person and I have COI concerns around that. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 15:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.
Shellwood (
talk) 16:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete "a professional in the field" simply means he works, I don't find reviews for the one book he wrote and the rest doesn't seem much beyond routine coverage. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There doesn't seem to be much significant coverage on the subject, probably fails WP:BIO. All the given references mention him only in passing and his book is not particularly well-known. It seems that his most noteworthy accomplishment is founding the company TrustedID, later acquired by Equifax. Possibly merge into Equifax. GoldMiner24 Talk 17:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete only passing references fails WP:GNG. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 04:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.