From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination, however, given the time-delay from earlier versus later comments. slakrtalk / 02:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Scooby Doo! Ghastly Goals (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks available sources. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 03:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply

KEEP Scooby Doo is well known and is notable. It does need some work but that cannot happen if deleted. 208.54.40.144 ( talk) 16:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Soft Delete The special hasn't been released yet and because of that there seems to be a dearth of information concerning the special, which has resulted in actual question marks being used in place of words in the entry. The release date is in two weeks, which would suggest it passes the WP:NFF requirements, but I can't find any reliable sourcing that confirms that. However, assuming the arguments for the other Scooby direct-to-dvd specials holds, I think the author should have access to update the entry and add reliable sources when they become available, hence my thinking on deletion subject to userfication. EBstrunk18 ( talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or Redirect until its release that is. Wgolf ( talk) 02:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Scooby-Doo#Direct-to-video specials. You could also do its predecessors. — Wylie pedia 07:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 17:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination, however, given the time-delay from earlier versus later comments. slakrtalk / 02:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Scooby Doo! Ghastly Goals (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks available sources. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 03:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply

KEEP Scooby Doo is well known and is notable. It does need some work but that cannot happen if deleted. 208.54.40.144 ( talk) 16:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Soft Delete The special hasn't been released yet and because of that there seems to be a dearth of information concerning the special, which has resulted in actual question marks being used in place of words in the entry. The release date is in two weeks, which would suggest it passes the WP:NFF requirements, but I can't find any reliable sourcing that confirms that. However, assuming the arguments for the other Scooby direct-to-dvd specials holds, I think the author should have access to update the entry and add reliable sources when they become available, hence my thinking on deletion subject to userfication. EBstrunk18 ( talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or Redirect until its release that is. Wgolf ( talk) 02:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Scooby-Doo#Direct-to-video specials. You could also do its predecessors. — Wylie pedia 07:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 17:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook