The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Primary editor has been banned for paid, promotional editing.
Also, notability of the subject is questionable (I am not qualified to assess the quality of all the non-English sources).
Patrick J. Welsh (
talk) 21:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: No "inherent" notability, though as the commander of a military branch he is more likely to have coverage in sources than a typical military officer. Sources likely to be in Uzbek/Russian.
Curbon7 (
talk) 00:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is an extremely weird article. I have checked the sources in Russian, almost none of them directly reference what is said in the article. Reference #3 is simply his picture during his study at the Aviation Institute. #4 Is just the list of all officers awarded a medal, with his name being on the list. #5 Is completely Irrelevant, its an article on Russian wiki about the rank of colonel. #7 Is a news article that does reference him, but again, completely irrelevant to the sentence it is referencing. #8 Is just his name in a list of Inspectors. The articles only source on him that actually talks about him in depth awas deleted twice because it was from a blog website. Looks 100% like a paid article
F.Alexsandr (
talk) 00:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Verifiably commander of Uzbekistan's air force, which clearly makes him notable per
WP:COMMONSENSE. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 11:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. He holds the position of the commander of Uzbekistan's air force, a role that undeniably establishes his notability — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Seanwarner582 (
talk •
contribs) 07:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete.: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Being a colonel who commanded a small military division does not make the subject notable, this is stretching the guideline well past the point a subject can be presumed (and it is well known that 'a presumption is not a guarantee a subject will automatically meets notability). This BLP subject fails any presumtion in the absence of WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. F.Alexsandr did a source review and found nothing, nothing in the Keep votes above has sources, just opinions. AfDs are determined by sourcing and notability.
This is a WP:BLP and requires strong sourcing, BLP is policy and overrides any guidelines. BLP policy and lack of SIGCOV from RS mean this needs to be deleted. //
Timothy ::
talk 08:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Primary editor has been banned for paid, promotional editing.
Also, notability of the subject is questionable (I am not qualified to assess the quality of all the non-English sources).
Patrick J. Welsh (
talk) 21:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: No "inherent" notability, though as the commander of a military branch he is more likely to have coverage in sources than a typical military officer. Sources likely to be in Uzbek/Russian.
Curbon7 (
talk) 00:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is an extremely weird article. I have checked the sources in Russian, almost none of them directly reference what is said in the article. Reference #3 is simply his picture during his study at the Aviation Institute. #4 Is just the list of all officers awarded a medal, with his name being on the list. #5 Is completely Irrelevant, its an article on Russian wiki about the rank of colonel. #7 Is a news article that does reference him, but again, completely irrelevant to the sentence it is referencing. #8 Is just his name in a list of Inspectors. The articles only source on him that actually talks about him in depth awas deleted twice because it was from a blog website. Looks 100% like a paid article
F.Alexsandr (
talk) 00:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Verifiably commander of Uzbekistan's air force, which clearly makes him notable per
WP:COMMONSENSE. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 11:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. He holds the position of the commander of Uzbekistan's air force, a role that undeniably establishes his notability — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Seanwarner582 (
talk •
contribs) 07:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete.: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Being a colonel who commanded a small military division does not make the subject notable, this is stretching the guideline well past the point a subject can be presumed (and it is well known that 'a presumption is not a guarantee a subject will automatically meets notability). This BLP subject fails any presumtion in the absence of WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. F.Alexsandr did a source review and found nothing, nothing in the Keep votes above has sources, just opinions. AfDs are determined by sourcing and notability.
This is a WP:BLP and requires strong sourcing, BLP is policy and overrides any guidelines. BLP policy and lack of SIGCOV from RS mean this needs to be deleted. //
Timothy ::
talk 08:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.