- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 20:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Sardar Malik
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sardar Malik ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article cites no sources, has nothing except the lead sentence, no mention of notability. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Week keep I've expanded the article a bit and added sources. May just be enough to establish notability per WP:GNG/ WP:CREATIVE. If the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, which is mentioned by the newswire obituary published unchanged by many newspapers ( eg), could be verified, notability would be unarguable. But the award cannot be verified and I'm dubious that he received it given his muted fame. Note that the Hindu obit does not mention the award; neither does Anu Malik in an interview in which he portray Sardar Malik as a struggling artist. Abecedare ( talk) 20:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as now has significant reliable sources coverage such as The Hindu and book sources, passes WP:GNG, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 20:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Sardar Malik
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sardar Malik ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article cites no sources, has nothing except the lead sentence, no mention of notability. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. QueerFilmNerd talk 18:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Week keep I've expanded the article a bit and added sources. May just be enough to establish notability per WP:GNG/ WP:CREATIVE. If the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, which is mentioned by the newswire obituary published unchanged by many newspapers ( eg), could be verified, notability would be unarguable. But the award cannot be verified and I'm dubious that he received it given his muted fame. Note that the Hindu obit does not mention the award; neither does Anu Malik in an interview in which he portray Sardar Malik as a struggling artist. Abecedare ( talk) 20:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as now has significant reliable sources coverage such as The Hindu and book sources, passes WP:GNG, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.