- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sarah Polonsky ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Thin on content. Promotional. Tagged as needing citations since December DaveApter ( talk) 09:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Notable media journalist, numerous reliable sources meets the general notability guideline.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 21:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (speak) @ 20:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (speak) @ 20:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - editor of Page Six seems notable. Bearian ( talk) 00:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Journalists are notoriously hard to get through the GNG gate since other publications don't write about contributors to their competitors and their own publications writing about them is regarded as self sourcing. We need to use discretion here. I feel that the career achievements of this individual merits inclusion, although honest people may certainly differ with this opinion. Carrite ( talk) 17:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sarah Polonsky ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Thin on content. Promotional. Tagged as needing citations since December DaveApter ( talk) 09:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Notable media journalist, numerous reliable sources meets the general notability guideline.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 21:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (speak) @ 20:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (speak) @ 20:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - editor of Page Six seems notable. Bearian ( talk) 00:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Journalists are notoriously hard to get through the GNG gate since other publications don't write about contributors to their competitors and their own publications writing about them is regarded as self sourcing. We need to use discretion here. I feel that the career achievements of this individual merits inclusion, although honest people may certainly differ with this opinion. Carrite ( talk) 17:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.