The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 14:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Nom'd due to:
"Lots of Ghits" is not a reason to keep an article, so let's not go there, okay? Dori ❦ ( Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 08:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I don't have an issue with this article existing, but I do think it shouldn't exist unless it contains references verifying that she's notable and why. In this case, I think that we should take our cue from the Italians; if they don't have a it:Sara Varone article, I don't see why we should. Given the number of times they've deleted attempts to create one and the utter lack of English-language sources, I'm just not seeing that there's a basis for an article. Dori ❦ ( Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 04:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 14:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Nom'd due to:
"Lots of Ghits" is not a reason to keep an article, so let's not go there, okay? Dori ❦ ( Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 08:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I don't have an issue with this article existing, but I do think it shouldn't exist unless it contains references verifying that she's notable and why. In this case, I think that we should take our cue from the Italians; if they don't have a it:Sara Varone article, I don't see why we should. Given the number of times they've deleted attempts to create one and the utter lack of English-language sources, I'm just not seeing that there's a basis for an article. Dori ❦ ( Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 04:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC) reply