From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 16:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Sanjeev Goel

Sanjeev Goel (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced WP:BLP, tagged as needing reference improvement since 2010 without further action, of a person notable only as a deputy leader of a minor political party. While the party is one whose leader generally gets over the bar, the same can't be said of the deputies — and being a deputy leader isn't a notability freebie under WP:NPOL. The extant source isn't even substantively about him, either, but merely namechecks his existence — and the article reads very like a campaign brochure, written almost entirely in incomplete sentence fragments and delving far more into unsourced statements of his beliefs and inspirations than into anything encyclopedic that he did. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 09:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom and above editor. Nothing in searches revealed anything to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NPOL criteria. Onel5969 TT me 13:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 16:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Sanjeev Goel

Sanjeev Goel (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced WP:BLP, tagged as needing reference improvement since 2010 without further action, of a person notable only as a deputy leader of a minor political party. While the party is one whose leader generally gets over the bar, the same can't be said of the deputies — and being a deputy leader isn't a notability freebie under WP:NPOL. The extant source isn't even substantively about him, either, but merely namechecks his existence — and the article reads very like a campaign brochure, written almost entirely in incomplete sentence fragments and delving far more into unsourced statements of his beliefs and inspirations than into anything encyclopedic that he did. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 09:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom and above editor. Nothing in searches revealed anything to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NPOL criteria. Onel5969 TT me 13:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook