The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a singer, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. The only notability claim stated here is that she came in third in an Idol series 15 years ago, which is not an instant notability freebie all by itself -- but there's virtually no claim that she's done anything else of note since then ("has appeared in various TV shows", without sources, being the sum total of the rest of the article).
This has, furthermore, been tagged for notability and sourcing issues since 2010 without improvement -- and given that the subject is from Peru, I checked es to see what was there, and found that an article was deleted in 2010 for advertorialism and notability issues and has never returned since.
So I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with more Spanish-language skills (and access to archived Peruvian media coverage from 15 years ago) than I've got can find enough improved sourcing to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced considerably better than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a singer, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. The only notability claim stated here is that she came in third in an Idol series 15 years ago, which is not an instant notability freebie all by itself -- but there's virtually no claim that she's done anything else of note since then ("has appeared in various TV shows", without sources, being the sum total of the rest of the article).
This has, furthermore, been tagged for notability and sourcing issues since 2010 without improvement -- and given that the subject is from Peru, I checked es to see what was there, and found that an article was deleted in 2010 for advertorialism and notability issues and has never returned since.
So I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with more Spanish-language skills (and access to archived Peruvian media coverage from 15 years ago) than I've got can find enough improved sourcing to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced considerably better than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)