- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. After the IP comments are discounted, we have only one editor who wants to "weakly" keep this; that's not enough. Sandstein 10:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sadaki Nakabayashi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant independent coverage. High rank is not enough to show notability. No indication he's notable as an author and the claims of being a great teacher are solely from his students (not independent). Running and judging some tournaments does not show notability. Jakejr ( talk) 22:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 22:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure but maybe weak keep as the martial arts coverage may be minimally acceptable and if he was well known, that would also be notable. It's also possible if there's any more coverage, it's not online; my searches found nothing better than Black Belt at Books. SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Did you find some significant independent coverage of him? I didn't and don't see proof that he meets the martial arts criteria at WP:MANOTE. Jakejr ( talk) 04:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- keep pre-internet era. Passes WP:GNG. Notable Author of Judo . Recognized as a prominant martial artist [1] Passes WP:MANOTE. 173.52.89.236 ( talk) 12:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- No vote yet but there is no indication that the judo books have had any impact so the term notable judo author is a bit fast and loose. Pre-internet has no relevance. Peter Rehse ( talk) 17:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No significant independent coverage of him. Passing mentions are not enough nor is being part of a panel discussing weight training in the martial arts. Astudent0 ( talk) 16:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep passes gng. Well respected and we'll known judo instructor and author 2607:FB90:E9A:510D:0:48:EBBF:E701 ( talk) 04:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Same unsupported claims as other new IP. Astudent0 ( talk) 17:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 06:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 06:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:MANOTE and WP:GNG since there is a lack of significant independent coverage. There are no supporting sources for the claim he's a notable author. Mdtemp ( talk) 14:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep Subject is a notable author and in judo. Passes gng
2607:FB90:246A:83B:0:24:F72F:A901 (
talk)
18:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Wow, still another new IP weighing in with the same unsupported claims. Papaursa ( talk) 20:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete He doesn't meet the general notability criteria or the specific criteria for martial artists or authors. The only sources that talk about him being a good teacher were written by students of his. There is no significant coverage from independent reliable sources to support any claims of notability. Papaursa ( talk) 20:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I was hoping to be swayed but I see nothing to show notability as an author (as my previous comment) and high rank does not sustain notability or being the teacher of twins whose own notability is borderline. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- comment Considered to be one of Japan's late great Judo Masters. This solidifies his GNG. [1] 173.52.89.236 ( talk) 21:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. After the IP comments are discounted, we have only one editor who wants to "weakly" keep this; that's not enough. Sandstein 10:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sadaki Nakabayashi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant independent coverage. High rank is not enough to show notability. No indication he's notable as an author and the claims of being a great teacher are solely from his students (not independent). Running and judging some tournaments does not show notability. Jakejr ( talk) 22:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 22:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure but maybe weak keep as the martial arts coverage may be minimally acceptable and if he was well known, that would also be notable. It's also possible if there's any more coverage, it's not online; my searches found nothing better than Black Belt at Books. SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Did you find some significant independent coverage of him? I didn't and don't see proof that he meets the martial arts criteria at WP:MANOTE. Jakejr ( talk) 04:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- keep pre-internet era. Passes WP:GNG. Notable Author of Judo . Recognized as a prominant martial artist [1] Passes WP:MANOTE. 173.52.89.236 ( talk) 12:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- No vote yet but there is no indication that the judo books have had any impact so the term notable judo author is a bit fast and loose. Pre-internet has no relevance. Peter Rehse ( talk) 17:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No significant independent coverage of him. Passing mentions are not enough nor is being part of a panel discussing weight training in the martial arts. Astudent0 ( talk) 16:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep passes gng. Well respected and we'll known judo instructor and author 2607:FB90:E9A:510D:0:48:EBBF:E701 ( talk) 04:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Same unsupported claims as other new IP. Astudent0 ( talk) 17:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 06:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 06:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:MANOTE and WP:GNG since there is a lack of significant independent coverage. There are no supporting sources for the claim he's a notable author. Mdtemp ( talk) 14:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep Subject is a notable author and in judo. Passes gng
2607:FB90:246A:83B:0:24:F72F:A901 (
talk)
18:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Wow, still another new IP weighing in with the same unsupported claims. Papaursa ( talk) 20:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete He doesn't meet the general notability criteria or the specific criteria for martial artists or authors. The only sources that talk about him being a good teacher were written by students of his. There is no significant coverage from independent reliable sources to support any claims of notability. Papaursa ( talk) 20:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I was hoping to be swayed but I see nothing to show notability as an author (as my previous comment) and high rank does not sustain notability or being the teacher of twins whose own notability is borderline. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- comment Considered to be one of Japan's late great Judo Masters. This solidifies his GNG. [1] 173.52.89.236 ( talk) 21:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.