From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC) reply

SMK Mahsuri

SMK Mahsuri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass the notability guidelines for organisations/companies or general notability guideline. Confirmed by a google search. Inactive editing and very small articles. Please also refer WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. NgYShung ( talk) 10:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 05:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per ORG. (ORG is the appropriate guideline, and it explicitly states that schools must meet the notability guidelines the same as any other organization.) I found some limited coverage, but, even giving the subject the benefit of the doubt due foreign schools, the available coverage is much less than the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources that the community requires. Rebb ing 01:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per long standing consensus on educational institutions of this type, that if sources verify the institution exists, cf. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES that says: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists", we default to keep. — Sam Sailor Talk! 09:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per source provided. – Davey2010 Talk 00:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC) reply

SMK Mahsuri

SMK Mahsuri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass the notability guidelines for organisations/companies or general notability guideline. Confirmed by a google search. Inactive editing and very small articles. Please also refer WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. NgYShung ( talk) 10:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 05:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per ORG. (ORG is the appropriate guideline, and it explicitly states that schools must meet the notability guidelines the same as any other organization.) I found some limited coverage, but, even giving the subject the benefit of the doubt due foreign schools, the available coverage is much less than the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources that the community requires. Rebb ing 01:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per long standing consensus on educational institutions of this type, that if sources verify the institution exists, cf. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES that says: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists", we default to keep. — Sam Sailor Talk! 09:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per source provided. – Davey2010 Talk 00:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook