- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 02:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
S6 (software)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- S6 (software) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not meet WP:GNG. The original redirect should be restored: Special:Permalink/618783298. MarioGom ( talk) 16:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software. MarioGom ( talk) 16:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For evaluation of the references provided on the article's talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: All sources provided in the talk page are wikis ( WP:UGC) and blogs ( WP:SPS). MarioGom ( talk) 05:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- I disagree, yes the article in question is quite short and definitely needs to be expanded, and reliable third party sources are needed, but these issues can be easily fixed and deleting this article is unnecessary,
- Another Wikipedia user has provided links to a few other sources and documentation in
Talk:S6_(software).
2603:7080:A903:F154:C5B5:865D:3F75:93DF (
talk)
15:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- None of these sources are secondary. See WP:RS. MarioGom ( talk) 20:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no depth of coverage in independent sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuartyeates ( talk • contribs) 10:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 02:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
S6 (software)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- S6 (software) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not meet WP:GNG. The original redirect should be restored: Special:Permalink/618783298. MarioGom ( talk) 16:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software. MarioGom ( talk) 16:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For evaluation of the references provided on the article's talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: All sources provided in the talk page are wikis ( WP:UGC) and blogs ( WP:SPS). MarioGom ( talk) 05:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- I disagree, yes the article in question is quite short and definitely needs to be expanded, and reliable third party sources are needed, but these issues can be easily fixed and deleting this article is unnecessary,
- Another Wikipedia user has provided links to a few other sources and documentation in
Talk:S6_(software).
2603:7080:A903:F154:C5B5:865D:3F75:93DF (
talk)
15:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- None of these sources are secondary. See WP:RS. MarioGom ( talk) 20:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no depth of coverage in independent sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuartyeates ( talk • contribs) 10:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.