The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unsourced BLP, basically a curriculum vitae of an undoubtedly busy and successful academic. Not sure if any of the claimed awards are significant. I'm struggling to find independent reliable sources about Milo or his work. The article strikes me as being created on Wikipedia for the wrong reasons.
Sionk (
talk) 21:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment:
[1] 52,000 cites, h-index of 79.
Curbon7 (
talk) 21:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Overwhelming pass of
WP:Prof#C1 at least. Nominations like this do not add to the reputation of Wikipedia.
Xxanthippe (
talk) 22:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC).reply
Keep. This should never have been proposed for deletion. Ron Milo is notable by any reasonable standards and will become more so.
Athel cb (
talk) 11:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. The citation style in the article is one of the worst I have seen for a scientist.
Geschichte (
talk) 07:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unsourced BLP, basically a curriculum vitae of an undoubtedly busy and successful academic. Not sure if any of the claimed awards are significant. I'm struggling to find independent reliable sources about Milo or his work. The article strikes me as being created on Wikipedia for the wrong reasons.
Sionk (
talk) 21:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment:
[1] 52,000 cites, h-index of 79.
Curbon7 (
talk) 21:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Overwhelming pass of
WP:Prof#C1 at least. Nominations like this do not add to the reputation of Wikipedia.
Xxanthippe (
talk) 22:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC).reply
Keep. This should never have been proposed for deletion. Ron Milo is notable by any reasonable standards and will become more so.
Athel cb (
talk) 11:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. The citation style in the article is one of the worst I have seen for a scientist.
Geschichte (
talk) 07:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.