The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Despite three relists, there is no consensus whether to keep, merge/redirect or delete. Consensus seems to be to keep it in one form or another but whether that's as a stand-alone article or merged somewhere was not resolved here. Fortunately, that can be discussed at the talk page. SoWhy20:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - disagree. Having a vessel named in your honor should be a sign of lasting notability. SOLDIER doesn't trump GNG. Having a named vessel leads to ongoing coverage (in books, articles, etc.) of the namesake.
Icewhiz (
talk)
11:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. That hasn't been the case in the past, including at least one Afd I started. Also you can't inherit notability from coverage of your namesake.
Clarityfiend (
talk)
19:30, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect and merge useful content to the article about the operational ship named after him. He certainly served with gallantry and honor, and died far too young, as have uncounted millions of soldiers. He does not meet
WP:SOLDIER.
Cullen328Let's discuss it05:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect: unfortunately, the subject does not seem notable enough for a stand-alone article. Nevertheless, I believe any reliably sourced information should be merged to the article on the ship that was commissioned, with the link relating to the Marine then becoming a redirect. Regards,
AustralianRupert (
talk)
03:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I'd add it to the dab page as "USS Rogers Blood has been the name of more than one United States Navy ship named after Marine Corps First Lieutenant Rogers Blood, who was killed leading a charge against the Japanese defenders of Engebi Island in World War II, for which he was awarded the Silver Star."
Clarityfiend (
talk)
08:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Despite three relists, there is no consensus whether to keep, merge/redirect or delete. Consensus seems to be to keep it in one form or another but whether that's as a stand-alone article or merged somewhere was not resolved here. Fortunately, that can be discussed at the talk page. SoWhy20:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - disagree. Having a vessel named in your honor should be a sign of lasting notability. SOLDIER doesn't trump GNG. Having a named vessel leads to ongoing coverage (in books, articles, etc.) of the namesake.
Icewhiz (
talk)
11:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. That hasn't been the case in the past, including at least one Afd I started. Also you can't inherit notability from coverage of your namesake.
Clarityfiend (
talk)
19:30, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect and merge useful content to the article about the operational ship named after him. He certainly served with gallantry and honor, and died far too young, as have uncounted millions of soldiers. He does not meet
WP:SOLDIER.
Cullen328Let's discuss it05:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect: unfortunately, the subject does not seem notable enough for a stand-alone article. Nevertheless, I believe any reliably sourced information should be merged to the article on the ship that was commissioned, with the link relating to the Marine then becoming a redirect. Regards,
AustralianRupert (
talk)
03:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I'd add it to the dab page as "USS Rogers Blood has been the name of more than one United States Navy ship named after Marine Corps First Lieutenant Rogers Blood, who was killed leading a charge against the Japanese defenders of Engebi Island in World War II, for which he was awarded the Silver Star."
Clarityfiend (
talk)
08:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.