The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No evidence of
notability found, source is database only, Prod removed with statement that he received a yellow card for Kaunas which is not really adressing the issue at hand. A search didn't immediately provide better sources, but perhaps with different search terms better results can be had. Article in any case needs thorough cleanup, stating that he "plays" for a club which folded in 2012 is slightly outdated at best.
Fram (
talk)
10:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Fram:. It just means you should point out Rogério, as a footballer, pass this or not:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability or
Wikipedia:Notability (sports). I simply don't have time to check Kaunas was a fully professional team or not, but at least some indication he has played for that league. While for SIGCOV, a lot of footballer even played in fully professional team in fully professional league, don't have SIGCOV.
Matthew hk (
talk)
04:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
About two years ago, the "played in a professional league = automatically notable" rule has been rejected at an RFC, and football players now need SIGCOV to be kept.
Fram (
talk)
07:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment inb4 Transfermarkt is user generated, but they're usually comprehensive on things, and they say he retired in 2009 after three games for Kaunas. If anyone knows enough about Lithuanian data to verify this, the bloke is not notable at all.
Unknown Temptation (
talk)
23:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No evidence of
notability found, source is database only, Prod removed with statement that he received a yellow card for Kaunas which is not really adressing the issue at hand. A search didn't immediately provide better sources, but perhaps with different search terms better results can be had. Article in any case needs thorough cleanup, stating that he "plays" for a club which folded in 2012 is slightly outdated at best.
Fram (
talk)
10:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Fram:. It just means you should point out Rogério, as a footballer, pass this or not:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability or
Wikipedia:Notability (sports). I simply don't have time to check Kaunas was a fully professional team or not, but at least some indication he has played for that league. While for SIGCOV, a lot of footballer even played in fully professional team in fully professional league, don't have SIGCOV.
Matthew hk (
talk)
04:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
About two years ago, the "played in a professional league = automatically notable" rule has been rejected at an RFC, and football players now need SIGCOV to be kept.
Fram (
talk)
07:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment inb4 Transfermarkt is user generated, but they're usually comprehensive on things, and they say he retired in 2009 after three games for Kaunas. If anyone knows enough about Lithuanian data to verify this, the bloke is not notable at all.
Unknown Temptation (
talk)
23:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.