The result was delete. All of the "keep" opinions don't address the argument for deletion that there are not sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. They certainly don't cite any sources. Sandstein 20:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The first AfD was closed as no consensus, with the notation, "as many of the "keep" votes lack supporting evidence or a foundation in policy. However, some do speak to the possibility of improvement with sources not presently found in the article. The absence of consensus does not spare this article from being renominated for deletion at a future point if additional reliable sources containing sufficiently in-depth coverage of the subject are not provided." 4 months after the first AfD was opened, and 3 months after it was closed, that sourcing has not been provided. Mccapra's original rationale of "BLP of a social activist who does not seem to have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. I see passing mentions and quotes from him as a spokesperson but nothing to suggest that he as an individual has attracted the kind of interest that would demonstrate notability. May be too soon." Still holds. Onel5969 TT me 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. All of the "keep" opinions don't address the argument for deletion that there are not sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. They certainly don't cite any sources. Sandstein 20:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The first AfD was closed as no consensus, with the notation, "as many of the "keep" votes lack supporting evidence or a foundation in policy. However, some do speak to the possibility of improvement with sources not presently found in the article. The absence of consensus does not spare this article from being renominated for deletion at a future point if additional reliable sources containing sufficiently in-depth coverage of the subject are not provided." 4 months after the first AfD was opened, and 3 months after it was closed, that sourcing has not been provided. Mccapra's original rationale of "BLP of a social activist who does not seem to have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. I see passing mentions and quotes from him as a spokesperson but nothing to suggest that he as an individual has attracted the kind of interest that would demonstrate notability. May be too soon." Still holds. Onel5969 TT me 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)