- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Robin De Groot ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Cites one "RS" which only mentions subject. No other sources could be found.
Does not meet WP:ENT: only one of 9 guest designers of Restaurant Makeover which is actually hosted by an additional 7 other people. —አቤል ዳዊት ? (Janweh64) ( talk) 01:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Television personalities, even on nationally televised reality shows, do not earn an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist — it's enough for an article if the person can actually be sourced over WP:GNG for it, but it is not an automatic pass that exempts them from having to pass GNG. But even on a deep ProQuest search, I get just seven hits on his name of which all seven are glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that aren't about him. All of which means we just don't have the sourcing required to make this keepable at all. Bearcat ( talk) 17:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Meets neither WP:GNG (per searches) or WP:ENT. Onel5969 TT me 16:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Robin De Groot ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Cites one "RS" which only mentions subject. No other sources could be found.
Does not meet WP:ENT: only one of 9 guest designers of Restaurant Makeover which is actually hosted by an additional 7 other people. —አቤል ዳዊት ? (Janweh64) ( talk) 01:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Television personalities, even on nationally televised reality shows, do not earn an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist — it's enough for an article if the person can actually be sourced over WP:GNG for it, but it is not an automatic pass that exempts them from having to pass GNG. But even on a deep ProQuest search, I get just seven hits on his name of which all seven are glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that aren't about him. All of which means we just don't have the sourcing required to make this keepable at all. Bearcat ( talk) 17:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Meets neither WP:GNG (per searches) or WP:ENT. Onel5969 TT me 16:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.