- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 15:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Robi Ludwig
- Robi Ludwig ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominating this for deletion on behalf of the subject. The rationale is as follows: This BLP is not the subject of multiple, in-depth reliable sources. The only source material available is regarding a WP:ONEVENT about a comment made on Fox News and the event does not elevate to the point of being of significant public interest. The article serves very little value to Wikipedia and its readers, but immense opportunity to harm a non-notable BLP, who has requested deletion per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. While the initial request was made through another editor on my talk page, the subject contacted OTRS to confirm via ticket:2014062810001187. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 01:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 15:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Robi Ludwig
- Robi Ludwig ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominating this for deletion on behalf of the subject. The rationale is as follows: This BLP is not the subject of multiple, in-depth reliable sources. The only source material available is regarding a WP:ONEVENT about a comment made on Fox News and the event does not elevate to the point of being of significant public interest. The article serves very little value to Wikipedia and its readers, but immense opportunity to harm a non-notable BLP, who has requested deletion per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. While the initial request was made through another editor on my talk page, the subject contacted OTRS to confirm via ticket:2014062810001187. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 01:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.