- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Robert L. Maginnis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Certainly not-notable per WP:SOLDIER. Google search has him with the Family Research Council, but that does not entail notability. Not notable as a pundit. – S. Rich ( talk) 14:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 22:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 22:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 22:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
He's also an author. http://www.amazon.com/Robert-L.-Maginnis/e/B00J5I8EJW/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1 Hcobb ( talk) 23:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Accordingly WP:AUTHOR applies. Which I do not think he meets. – S. Rich ( talk) 04:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete fails to meet either WP:SOLDIER or WP:AUTHOR. ƬheStrike Σagle 14:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 01:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 01:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Zero evidence for notability. DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient coverage from reliable sources for notability. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 23:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Robert L. Maginnis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Certainly not-notable per WP:SOLDIER. Google search has him with the Family Research Council, but that does not entail notability. Not notable as a pundit. – S. Rich ( talk) 14:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 22:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 22:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 22:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
He's also an author. http://www.amazon.com/Robert-L.-Maginnis/e/B00J5I8EJW/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1 Hcobb ( talk) 23:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Accordingly WP:AUTHOR applies. Which I do not think he meets. – S. Rich ( talk) 04:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete fails to meet either WP:SOLDIER or WP:AUTHOR. ƬheStrike Σagle 14:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 01:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 01:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Zero evidence for notability. DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient coverage from reliable sources for notability. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 23:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.