The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep,
WP:SK3, inadequate or completely erroneous nomination. One of a spree of recent nominations (by unrelated nominators) that neither take into account the criteria of
WP:PROF nor evidence even the most cursory of
WP:BEFORE searches. His Google Scholar profile
[1] and faculty profile
[2] provide clear passes of five
WP:PROF criteria, one of which was also clearly stated in the article as nominated, any one of which would be enough by itself, and none of which depend on secondary sources. His heavy citation counts give him a pass of #C1, his "distinguished professor" title gives him a pass of #C5, and his membership in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (the better of the two AAAS's) gives him a pass of #C3. His
Troland Award also gives him a likely pass of #C2. And his editorship of Current Directions in Psychological Science passes #C8. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
23:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep,
WP:SK3, inadequate or completely erroneous nomination. One of a spree of recent nominations (by unrelated nominators) that neither take into account the criteria of
WP:PROF nor evidence even the most cursory of
WP:BEFORE searches. His Google Scholar profile
[1] and faculty profile
[2] provide clear passes of five
WP:PROF criteria, one of which was also clearly stated in the article as nominated, any one of which would be enough by itself, and none of which depend on secondary sources. His heavy citation counts give him a pass of #C1, his "distinguished professor" title gives him a pass of #C5, and his membership in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (the better of the two AAAS's) gives him a pass of #C3. His
Troland Award also gives him a likely pass of #C2. And his editorship of Current Directions in Psychological Science passes #C8. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
23:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.