The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject clearly fails
WP:GNG, not notable. Most of the refs are interviews (some clearly PR thing), failing the need for the sources to be independent.
Zoodino (
talk)
16:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, All references are in favor of the article. When the article was created, the administrator himself removed the Speedy deletion notice from the article - stating that the references were in favor.
Edit HistoryMr. Wiki Indian (
talk)
07:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Mr. Wiki Indian:, Can you elaborate what do you mean by "All references are in favor of the article", because just having some links as references is not sufficient, the sources need to reliable and independent and should have significant coverage of the subject. (in this case, some of the reference source may be reliable but most of them are interviews and PR articles which can't be considered independent)
Zoodino (
talk)
05:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Looks like this account is a sock of LowSlo, I've reported and awaiting admin intervention
here
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject clearly fails
WP:GNG, not notable. Most of the refs are interviews (some clearly PR thing), failing the need for the sources to be independent.
Zoodino (
talk)
16:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, All references are in favor of the article. When the article was created, the administrator himself removed the Speedy deletion notice from the article - stating that the references were in favor.
Edit HistoryMr. Wiki Indian (
talk)
07:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Mr. Wiki Indian:, Can you elaborate what do you mean by "All references are in favor of the article", because just having some links as references is not sufficient, the sources need to reliable and independent and should have significant coverage of the subject. (in this case, some of the reference source may be reliable but most of them are interviews and PR articles which can't be considered independent)
Zoodino (
talk)
05:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Looks like this account is a sock of LowSlo, I've reported and awaiting admin intervention
here
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.