The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom. A Google search turned up a couple of mentions of the subject along with other voice actresses. No notability has been shown using reliable sources. Fails
WP:GNG and does not meet
WP:BASIC.
AuthorAuthor (
talk)
01:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: per nom. If you check the link above to ja.wp, it shows no references and is substituting their oown opinion for notability criteria using
WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST arguments and the nonsense other Wikipedia language claim ("...any article that has 4 other pages in other languages..."). IS RS with SIGCOV alone show notability: Wikipedia in any language is not a reliable source for content or notability; if IS RS with SIGCOV sources are found inother Wikipedias they can be obviously used, but the articles themselves are in no way an indication of notability. The above fails to mention there are no sources and moves on to mistake popularity or notarity for notability ("she's notable as she has done tv shows, photo books, music, movies and so forth"). Popularity does not equal notability per
WP:BIO.
An actual BEFORE in en and ja showed only promo material, database style listings, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (
WP:V and
WP:BLP) and guidelines (
WP:BIO and
WP:RS). //
Timothy ::
talk01:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom. A Google search turned up a couple of mentions of the subject along with other voice actresses. No notability has been shown using reliable sources. Fails
WP:GNG and does not meet
WP:BASIC.
AuthorAuthor (
talk)
01:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: per nom. If you check the link above to ja.wp, it shows no references and is substituting their oown opinion for notability criteria using
WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST arguments and the nonsense other Wikipedia language claim ("...any article that has 4 other pages in other languages..."). IS RS with SIGCOV alone show notability: Wikipedia in any language is not a reliable source for content or notability; if IS RS with SIGCOV sources are found inother Wikipedias they can be obviously used, but the articles themselves are in no way an indication of notability. The above fails to mention there are no sources and moves on to mistake popularity or notarity for notability ("she's notable as she has done tv shows, photo books, music, movies and so forth"). Popularity does not equal notability per
WP:BIO.
An actual BEFORE in en and ja showed only promo material, database style listings, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (
WP:V and
WP:BLP) and guidelines (
WP:BIO and
WP:RS). //
Timothy ::
talk01:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.