- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 00:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richard Jeremiah Walsh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks evidence of notability, appears to fail WP:GNG and while NFOOTY is gone, does not even qualify for consideration under NSPORTS and would not have for the old FOOTY either. One of four investors in a secondary soccer team is not sufficient, and there seems no other ground at all. Further, >70% of the article is about the investment play on the football club, with almost nothing on the apparent subject at all. Searches do not suggest any better grounds for an article. SeoR ( talk) 20:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Football, Ireland, and Lithuania. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to FC Stumbras. Respublik ( talk) 21:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Does not need a redirect. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 22:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I don't think any of the material in article merits a merge. Neutral on redirect. // Timothy :: talk 08:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 00:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richard Jeremiah Walsh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks evidence of notability, appears to fail WP:GNG and while NFOOTY is gone, does not even qualify for consideration under NSPORTS and would not have for the old FOOTY either. One of four investors in a secondary soccer team is not sufficient, and there seems no other ground at all. Further, >70% of the article is about the investment play on the football club, with almost nothing on the apparent subject at all. Searches do not suggest any better grounds for an article. SeoR ( talk) 20:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Football, Ireland, and Lithuania. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to FC Stumbras. Respublik ( talk) 21:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Does not need a redirect. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 22:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I don't think any of the material in article merits a merge. Neutral on redirect. // Timothy :: talk 08:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.