The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - I think the Ecuadorian league is weird case where it's not listed as fully pro on
WP:FOOTY, so you have to decide on
WP:GNG to decide if you keep the page or not. However, this particular footballer has played in the
Copa Libertadores and has played for the biggest Ecuadorian teams so probably enough to keep. Maybe could be fixed up a bit.--
Ortizesp (
talk)
15:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Question Have you actually read through NFooty and GNG? Also there is no indication that Ecuadorian league is fully-professional.
Govvy (
talk)
22:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I asked you a simple yes or no question. I consider you new here so I am trying to give you a chance, but to me you are starting to act like you've been around for years and your account isn't that old in my opinion. You voted to delete another article which is really a keep and you vote keep for this article which lacks
WP:SIGCOV. So please don't play people for falls they don't like that. You are getting dangerously close to smelling like a
WP:DUCK.
Govvy (
talk)
08:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I see
User:Govvy blanked the comment on their talk page; needless to say, Govvy's comment was rude ... the word "actually" didn't need to be there, and the use of, was unnecessary - not sure what else is going on, but let's be real here for once.
Nfitz (
talk)
02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - if Ecuador's Barcelona is a fully pro club then this player does meet NFOOTY based on the fact that they have played in Copa Libertadores matches against Botafogo, Estudiantes etc.
Spiderone10:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - to suggest that the top Ecuadorian league isn't fully professional is laughable. It's not listed on WP:FPL because of a lack of sources - but simply common sense says that teams in a relatively wealthy country in front of tens of thousands of people are fully-professional. No one has ever found any sources saying they aren't fully-professional either! And not surprisingly, they meet
WP:GNG, as you'd expect for a player with years of experience in fully-professional leagues, see
one,
two,
three,
four.
Nfitz (
talk)
02:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - The Ecuador's professional league soccer was created on 20 April 2018, according to
LigaPro, and the first two divisions (Serie A and Serie B) are managed by it.
Tárik (
talk)
16:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - GNG clearly met as evidenced by Nfitz. Article creator Tárik showing evidence that strongly suggests we're talking about a fully pro league anyway
Spiderone16:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - I think the Ecuadorian league is weird case where it's not listed as fully pro on
WP:FOOTY, so you have to decide on
WP:GNG to decide if you keep the page or not. However, this particular footballer has played in the
Copa Libertadores and has played for the biggest Ecuadorian teams so probably enough to keep. Maybe could be fixed up a bit.--
Ortizesp (
talk)
15:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Question Have you actually read through NFooty and GNG? Also there is no indication that Ecuadorian league is fully-professional.
Govvy (
talk)
22:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I asked you a simple yes or no question. I consider you new here so I am trying to give you a chance, but to me you are starting to act like you've been around for years and your account isn't that old in my opinion. You voted to delete another article which is really a keep and you vote keep for this article which lacks
WP:SIGCOV. So please don't play people for falls they don't like that. You are getting dangerously close to smelling like a
WP:DUCK.
Govvy (
talk)
08:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I see
User:Govvy blanked the comment on their talk page; needless to say, Govvy's comment was rude ... the word "actually" didn't need to be there, and the use of, was unnecessary - not sure what else is going on, but let's be real here for once.
Nfitz (
talk)
02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - if Ecuador's Barcelona is a fully pro club then this player does meet NFOOTY based on the fact that they have played in Copa Libertadores matches against Botafogo, Estudiantes etc.
Spiderone10:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - to suggest that the top Ecuadorian league isn't fully professional is laughable. It's not listed on WP:FPL because of a lack of sources - but simply common sense says that teams in a relatively wealthy country in front of tens of thousands of people are fully-professional. No one has ever found any sources saying they aren't fully-professional either! And not surprisingly, they meet
WP:GNG, as you'd expect for a player with years of experience in fully-professional leagues, see
one,
two,
three,
four.
Nfitz (
talk)
02:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - The Ecuador's professional league soccer was created on 20 April 2018, according to
LigaPro, and the first two divisions (Serie A and Serie B) are managed by it.
Tárik (
talk)
16:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - GNG clearly met as evidenced by Nfitz. Article creator Tárik showing evidence that strongly suggests we're talking about a fully pro league anyway
Spiderone16:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.