The result was Delete -- JForget 01:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Page is definitely a violation of NPOV. Focusing on the Republican Party scandals in particular due to their "running a platform on family values" (as stated in the article) is definitely anti-Republican and does not belong in a neutral encyclopedia. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 23:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC) reply
As far as bias of this particular article, I am british, living in London - I hardly have a dog in the race. I agree the article needs to be written objectively, but simply because it exists doesnt make it politically biased. Jacksonmahr ( talk) 00:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 01:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Page is definitely a violation of NPOV. Focusing on the Republican Party scandals in particular due to their "running a platform on family values" (as stated in the article) is definitely anti-Republican and does not belong in a neutral encyclopedia. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 23:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC) reply
As far as bias of this particular article, I am british, living in London - I hardly have a dog in the race. I agree the article needs to be written objectively, but simply because it exists doesnt make it politically biased. Jacksonmahr ( talk) 00:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC) reply