- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as an unsourced BLP. One can't "contest" a BLP PROD without actually adding sources, and it has expired now. — David Eppstein ( talk) 05:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Reja Rahish
- Reja Rahish ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested BLP PROD, no citations in the article, and not a notable singer. It also fails WP:NPOV. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't think there is such a thing as a contested BLP Prod? Either a biography has references or - as in this case - it doesn't. I have replaced the BLP Prod tag as remaining relevant, though its duration will now be running in parallel with this AfD. AllyD ( talk) 08:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I think more contestable would be that the article is on a living person, but no one disputes that, and so we should delete unless we have multiple sources so the article might pass GNG. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as an unsourced BLP. One can't "contest" a BLP PROD without actually adding sources, and it has expired now. — David Eppstein ( talk) 05:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Reja Rahish
- Reja Rahish ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested BLP PROD, no citations in the article, and not a notable singer. It also fails WP:NPOV. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't think there is such a thing as a contested BLP Prod? Either a biography has references or - as in this case - it doesn't. I have replaced the BLP Prod tag as remaining relevant, though its duration will now be running in parallel with this AfD. AllyD ( talk) 08:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I think more contestable would be that the article is on a living person, but no one disputes that, and so we should delete unless we have multiple sources so the article might pass GNG. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.