The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It's possible I am missing something, but none of the sources appear to actually mention the subject of the article.
CorporateM (
Talk) 20:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:CORP. While this organization appears authentic, all I can find in books and periodicals are some passing mentions.
Erik (
talk |
contribs) 02:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SarahStierch (
talk) 01:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 03:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It's possible I am missing something, but none of the sources appear to actually mention the subject of the article.
CorporateM (
Talk) 20:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:CORP. While this organization appears authentic, all I can find in books and periodicals are some passing mentions.
Erik (
talk |
contribs) 02:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SarahStierch (
talk) 01:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 03:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.